| # |
REPORT TITLE |
| 1 |
|
| |
This report provides failure report of assets located at particular site. The graphical representation indicates which asset is not under statistical control. |
| 2 |
|
| |
This report facilitates maintenance manager to understand failure details such as asset failures, breakdown causes and time etc. by location. |
| 3 |
|
| |
The bathtub curve provides asset failure details such as failure number, cause, failure date, TBF and failure rate. The bathtub curve for failure rate against failure number projects early failures, random failures and wear out failures. The report is typically meant for maintenance professionals for asset performance management. |
| 4 |
|
| |
This report shows weekly report for particular department. Graphical representation provides monthly completed CM work orders and weekly completed CM work
order count. Cross tab shows Completed CM WO Closed for the week summary by Site & Priority and Open Corrective Work Order Remaining summary by Site & Priority. |
| 5 |
|
| |
This model will identify the failure causes which affects the reliability of an asset.It will also show the significant difference in reliability of an asset after removing failure cause(s). |
| 6 |
|
| |
Helps to determine root causes.Encourages Group participation.Increases process knowledge.Indicates possible causes of variation. |
| 7 |
|
| |
This report is meant for maintenance managers as it forecasts the total downtime hours using seasonal exponential smoothing method. Downtime hours documented month-wise are used to forecast downtime for next six months. It helps to plan material and spare parts in order to achieve effective asset optimization. |
| 8 |
|
| |
This report is meant for maintenance managers as it forecasts the total downtime hours using seasonal exponential smoothing method. Downtime hours documented month-wise are used to forecast downtime for next six months. It helps to plan material and spare parts in order to achieve effective asset optimization. |
| 9 |
|
| |
Number of Failures for class of asset or an asset will be foretasted using Time Series Model. |
| 10 |
|
| |
This report is useful for the maintenance manager to forecast time between failure. The report indicates failure code, actual TBF, forecasted TBF etc. TBF forecasting using Holt winter exponential smoothing method facilitates management to take decisions in order to avoid failures. |
| 11 |
|
| |
Time Between Failures for an asset will be forecasted using Time series model.It will help to estimate next few failures for an asset. |
| 12 |
|
| |
This report shows Pareto Analysis for total Time To Repair (TTR) by
problem code for particular asset. |
| 13 |
|
| |
"Number of failures for an asset are recorded for different time point. A center line, is the average number of failures, which is calculated from the data .
Upper and lower control limits (sometimes called ""natural process limits"") that indicate the threshold at which the maintenance process is considered statistically 'unlikely'.
Upper and lower warning limits, drawn as separate lines, typically two standard deviations above and below the center line.
"
|
| 14 |
|
| |
Monte carlo simulation are used to estimate future instances of failures by failure code using the known failure and repair distribution. |
| 15 |
|
| |
Monte carlo simulation are used to estimate future instances of failures by failure code using the known failure and repair distribution. |
| 16 |
|
| |
Monte Carlo Simulation will be used to forecast causes of failure by simulation time to failure for an asset. |
| 17 |
|
| |
This report provides failure report of assets located at particular site. The graphical representation indicates which asset is not under statistical control. |
| 18 |
|
| |
Monte carlo simulation are used to estimate future instances of failures by failure code using the known failure and repair distribution.
|
| 19 |
|
| |
This report is typically meant for maintenance engineers. The Pareto analysis technique indicates the number of failures, for particular asset, due to particular cause. If the failures are controlled, it results in proper asset optimization for optimum productivity. |
| 20 |
|
| |
This report shows the Pareto analysis technique in decision making for an asset, used for selection of a limited number of
tasks that produce significant overall effect. It uses the Pareto principal, a large majority of problems (80%) are produced by a few key causes
(20%). |